Skip to Main Content

Instructional Guidance During 2024 UAW Strike

Academic Senate

To: Academic Senate Faculty

Key topics:

 
Dear Colleagues:

Amid potential disruptions to instruction and final exams due to the UAW strike, we write to provide guidance to support teaching and learning, access to education, and the safety and well-being of our campus community. We encourage instructors to extend flexibility, kindness, and understanding to students and colleagues who may be impacted during this time.

University Policies

Temporary Changes to Academic Policies 

The Undergraduate and Graduate Councils have authorized the following temporary adjustments to academic policies:

  • Undergraduate students may change the grading basis of an optionally graded course using MyUCLA, without a petition or fee, through Friday of Week 9, for Spring 2024.
  • Departments, Interdepartmental Degree Programs (IDPs), and schools are temporarily authorized to allow graduate students in good academic standing to enroll in more than one course graded on a Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory (S/U) basis for Spring 2024, including courses within the degree program, provided that the departments, IDPs, or schools will accept these courses towards fulfilling degree requirements if taken for an S/U grade. For students who are not in good academic standing, departments must submit a petition form and an updated academic plan for each student to take courses for S/U grading, which would normally be taken for a letter grade.

Adjusting Assignments and Final Assessments 

Students expect to be evaluated according to the methods announced in the syllabus.

Instructors maintain customary discretion and autonomy to adapt courses, assignments, and exams to extenuating circumstances while honoring Academic Senate regulations and departmental policies as well as ensuring equitable access for all students. Instructors should consult with departments to explore potential adjustments that can be equitably applied to all students.

Adjustments to final exam regulations are currently being reviewed by the Academic Senate. Under Senate regulations, instructors may neither cancel previously announced final assessments nor fundamentally change the method of final assessment (e.g., if the syllabus said an exam would be given, the final assessment must be an exam, not a research paper, and vice versa). However, subject to department policy, instructors may have discretion to alter the form and content of final assessments. For example:

  • Exam formats can be shifted to a shorter, more structured format (such as multiple choice) to facilitate student preparation and timely grading.
  • Instructors can use “no harm” exams, exam questions, papers, or other assessments that students may choose to opt out of. “No harm” means that the assessment only counts if it improves the student’s grade (otherwise, the grade is based on previously submitted work). This option may reduce student stress and instructor grading effort while still being fair to students seeking a chance to improve their grades.
  • For a final paper, an instructor could consider altering the page limit or evaluating based on a focused stage in the writing process (e.g., assigning a detailed outline or annotated bibliography in lieu of a typical research paper, or assigning a revision plan for a previous paper).

Additional resources to support academic continuity are outlined on the Equitable Approaches to Teaching Through Times of Uncertainty opens a new window guidance.

Submitting Grades

For undergraduate students, the impact of delayed submission of grades increases with the length of the delay. Delays will affect students who need grades for scholarship, job and graduate school applications, and awarding of degrees. Specific groups of students, such as veterans and athletes, may find their benefits and eligibility impacted.

We encourage faculty to review UCLA grade definitions opens a new window. If you are unable to assign grades, you may elect to not submit them or temporarily use the NR grade for some or all of your students.

Grading Graduate Coursework

In grading graduate coursework, faculty have a large degree of professional responsibility and authority to determine how to evaluate research done for academic credit. Senate faculty are approaching this situation from many perspectives. This communication is not intended to suggest which views faculty should hold, but to outline options that may be helpful to students and faculty.

The Academic Senate may provide further guidance regarding other academic adjustments and final exams as necessary.

While we recognize that individual instructors must weigh various options as appropriate for particular classes, we hope that this guidance will support your professional judgment in determining how to best support your students and academic continuity.  We appreciate your continued efforts to support UCLA’s academic mission during this challenging time.

Sincerely,
Brooke Scelza
Chair, Graduate Council

Catherine Sugar
Chair, Undergraduate Council

Andrea M. Kasko
Chair, Academic Senate

Kathy Bawn
Vice Chair/Chair Elect, UCLA Academic Senate

Jessica Cattelino
Immediate Past Chair, UCLA Academic Senate

Download this BruinPost PDF Here opens a new window